The Reception of the Sokal Affair in France—”Pomo” Hunting or Intellectual Mccarthyism?: A Propos of Impostures Intellectuelles by A. Sokal and J. Bricmont. Imposturas Intelectuais (Alan Sokal & Jean Bricmont). 2 likes. Book. Papers by Alan Sokal on the “Social Text Affair”; Sokal-Bricmont book . São Paulo, Jornal de Resenhas, 11 abril ); “Descomposturas intelectuais”, ” Imposturas e fantasias”, by Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont (Folha de.
|Published (Last):||25 September 2014|
|PDF File Size:||16.48 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.52 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
At Whom Are We Laughing? The book gives a chapter to each of the inetlectuais authors, “the tip of the iceberg” of a group of intellectual practices that can be described as “mystification, deliberately sikal language, confused thinking and the misuse of scientific concepts.
Noam Chomsky called the book “very important” and said that “a lot of the so-called ‘left’ criticism [of science] seems to be pure nonsense”. The book was published in French inand in English in ; the English editions were revised for greater relevance to debates in the English-speaking world.
According to New York Review of Books editor Barbara Epsteinwho was delighted by Sokal’s hoaxwithin the humanities the response to the book was bitterly divided, with some delighted and some enraged;  in some reading groupsreaction was polarized between impassioned supporters and equally impassioned intelcetuais of Sokal.
Imposturas intelectuais – Alan D. Sokal, Jean Bricmont – Google Books
Sokal is best known for the Sokal Affairin which he submitted a deliberately absurd article  to Social Texta critical theory journal, and was able to get it published.
Retrieved March 5, He calls it ridiculous alab weird that there are intensities of treatment by the scientists, in particular, that he was “much less badly treated,” when in fact he was the main target of the US press.
The book has been criticized by post-modern philosophers and by scholars with some interest in continental philosophy. London Review of Books. Richard Dawkinsin a review of this book, said regarding the discussion of Lacan: Event occurs at 3: Their aim is “not to criticize the left, but to help defend it from a trendy segment of itself. University of Michigan Press.
Two Millennia of Mathematics: The stated goal of the book is not to attack “philosophy, the humanities or the social sciences in general Fink says that “Lacan could easily assume that his faithful seminar public Probably ipmosturas one concerned with postmodernism has remained unaware of it.
University of Minnesota Press.
Sara Farmhouse Bizarro, Imposturas Intelectuais, de Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont – PhilPapers
Bruce Fink offers a critique in his book Lacan to the Letterwhere he accuses Sokal and Bricmont of impostursa that “serious writing” do nothing other than “convey clear meanings”. Views Read Edit View history. He then writes of his hope that in the future this work is pursued more seriously and with dignity at the level of the issues involved. Responses from the scientific community were more supportive. Alan Sokal Jean Bricmont. The extracts are intentionally rather long to avoid accusations of taking sentences out of context.
Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd ed. While Fink and Plotnitsky question Sokal and Bricmont’s right to say what definitions of scientific terms are correct, imoosturas theorists and literary critics Impowturas Milner and Jeff Browitt acknowledge that right, seeing it as “defend[ing] their disciplines against what they saw as a misappropriation of key terms and concepts” by writers such as Lacan and Irigaray.
Cover of the first edition. Number Theory for Computing 2nd ed.
This latter point has been disputed by Arkady Plotnitsky one of the authors mentioned by Sokal in his original hoax. Sokal and Bricmont highlight the rising tide of what they call cognitive relativismthe belief that there are no objective truths but only local beliefs. Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science Cover of the first edition. Limiting her considerations to physics, science hystorian Mara Beller  maintained that it was not entirely fair to blame contemporary postmodern philosophers for drawing nonsensical inelectuais from quantum physics which they did dosince many such conclusions were drawn by some of the leading quantum physicists themselves, such as Bohr or Heisenberg when they ventured into philosophy.
Postmodernism Philosophy of science. The Knowable and the Unknowable.